Deadlock detection in distributed databases

ABSTRACT

The subject technology performs a locking operation on a first set of keys by a first statement of a first transaction. The subject technology determines that a conflict occurred between the first statement and a second transaction. The subject technology determines that the second transaction has yet to complete after a predetermined period of time. The subject technology performs a deadlock detection process where the subject technology stores a key and value in a table indicating the first transaction and the second transaction, detects, based at least in part on a graph traversal of the table starting from the first transaction, a cycle between the first transaction and the second transaction, and determines that the first transaction is a youngest transaction in the detected cycle. The subject technology ceases execution of the first transaction in response to the first transaction being a youngest transaction in a detected cycle.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/334,946, filed May 31, 2021, entitled “DISTRIBUTED DEADLOCK DETECTION AND RESOLUTION IN DISTRIBUTED DATABASES”, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/201,487, filed Apr. 30, 2021, entitled “DISTRIBUTED DEADLOCK DETECTION AND RESOLUTION IN DISTRIBUTED DATABASES,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the disclosure relate generally to a network-based database system or a cloud data platform and, more specifically, to processing concurrent transactions to enable transactional processing in a safe and performant manner (e.g., avoiding deadlock and starvation) within the database system.

BACKGROUND

Cloud-based data warehouses and other database systems or data platforms sometimes provide support for transactional processing that enable such systems to perform operations that are not available through the built-in, system-defined functions. However, for mitigating security risks, security mechanisms to ensure that user code running on such systems remain isolated are needed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present disclosure will be understood more fully from the detailed description given below and from the accompanying drawings of various embodiments of the disclosure.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example computing environment that includes a network-based database system in communication with a cloud storage platform, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of a compute service manager, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating components of an execution platform, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a computing environment conceptually illustrating an example software architecture for managing and executing concurrent transactions on a database system, which can be performed by a given execution node of the execution platform, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 10 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of a machine in the form of a computer system within which a set of instructions may be executed for causing the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to specific example embodiments for carrying out the inventive subject matter. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, and specific details are set forth in the following description in order to provide a thorough understanding of the subject matter. It will be understood that these examples are not intended to limit the scope of the claims to the illustrated embodiments. On the contrary, they are intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the scope of the disclosure.

In database systems, performing transactions on a given database can be supported. To facilitate that a given transaction is committed to a table, existing database systems can employ varying approaches including Online Transactional Processing (OLTP) techniques. As discussed herein, OLTP refers to a category of data processing that involves transaction-oriented tasks. In an example, OLTP involves inserting, updating, and/or deleting varying amounts of data in a given database. OLTP can deal with large numbers of transactions by a large number of users. Increasingly, such transactions occur within and users are working in a distributed and networked environment from varying locations and computing environments. Thus, it is also increasingly important to ensure such transactions execute and complete in a concurrent manner that protects the integrity and consistency of the data in such a distributed environment.

As described herein, the subject technology provides concurrency control and isolation for executing a series of query statements (e.g., SQL statements) within a transaction against a linearizable storage. In particular, the subject technology employs a concurrency control mechanism that is a combination of a multi-version concurrency control for read operations (MVCC) and locking for write operations. Additionally, the subject technology implements a targeted isolation level (e.g., snapshot isolation), where each statement can execute against a different snapshot of a database, and write locks are held until a transaction commit.

The subject technology, in an embodiment, implements a two-level transaction hierarchy, where a top-level transaction corresponds to a SQL transaction, and a nested transaction corresponds to a SQL statement within the parent SQL transaction. A given nested transaction can perform read and write operations, and can perform a rollback and restart execution zero or more times before succeeding. Upon transaction commit, write operations can become visible, and write locks held by each contained statement can be released.

Further, embodiments of the subject technology address deadlock detection and resolution for databases. Advantageously, the subject technology avoids false positives where only transactions involved in a deadlock will be aborted. This is helpful for users to find deadlocks in their application code so that deadlocks can be fixed. In addition, the subject technology implements embodiments of distributed deadlock detection without a centralized transaction manager. In an example, this is desirable for distributed databases, where each transaction is executed by a separate job, so that the coordination among different jobs/nodes are minimized.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example computing environment 100 that includes a database system in the example form of a network-based database system 102, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. To avoid obscuring the inventive subject matter with unnecessary detail, various functional components that are not germane to conveying an understanding of the inventive subject matter have been omitted from FIG. 1 . However, a skilled artisan will readily recognize that various additional functional components may be included as part of the computing environment 100 to facilitate additional functionality that is not specifically described herein. In other embodiments, the computing environment may comprise another type of network-based database system or a cloud data platform.

As shown, the computing environment 100 comprises the network-based database system 102 in communication with a cloud storage platform 104 (e.g., AWS®, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage®, or Google Cloud Storage), and a cloud credential store provider 106. The network-based database system 102 is a network-based system used for reporting and analysis of integrated data from one or more disparate sources including one or more storage locations within the cloud storage platform 104. The cloud storage platform 104 comprises a plurality of computing machines and provides on-demand computer system resources such as data storage and computing power to the network-based database system 102.

The network-based database system 102 comprises a compute service manager 108, an execution platform 110, and one or more metadata databases 112. The network-based database system 102 hosts and provides data reporting and analysis services to multiple client accounts.

The compute service manager 108 coordinates and manages operations of the network-based database system 102. The compute service manager 108 also performs query optimization and compilation as well as managing clusters of computing services that provide compute resources (also referred to as “virtual warehouses”). The compute service manager 108 can support any number of client accounts such as end users providing data storage and retrieval requests, system administrators managing the systems and methods described herein, and other components/devices that interact with compute service manager 108.

The compute service manager 108 is also in communication with a client device 114. The client device 114 corresponds to a user of one of the multiple client accounts supported by the network-based database system 102. A user may utilize the client device 114 to submit data storage, retrieval, and analysis requests to the compute service manager 108.

The compute service manager 108 is also coupled to one or more metadata databases 112 that store metadata pertaining to various functions and aspects associated with the network-based database system 102 and its users. For example, a metadata database 112 may include a summary of data stored in remote data storage systems as well as data available from a local cache. Additionally, a metadata database 112 may include information regarding how data is organized in remote data storage systems (e.g., the cloud storage platform 104) and the local caches. Information stored by a metadata database 112 allows systems and services to determine whether a piece of data needs to be accessed without loading or accessing the actual data from a storage device.

As another example, a metadata database 112 can store one or more credential objects 115. In general, a credential object 115 indicates one or more security credentials to be retrieved from a remote credential store. For example, the credential store provider 106 maintains multiple remote credential stores 118-1 to 118-N. Each of the remote credential stores 118-1 to 118-N may be associated with a user account and may be used to store security credentials associated with the user account. A credential object 115 can indicate one of more security credentials to be retrieved by the compute service manager 108 from one of the remote credential stores 118-1 to 118-N (e.g., for use in accessing data stored by the storage platform 104).

The compute service manager 108 is further coupled to the execution platform 110, which provides multiple computing resources that execute various data storage and data retrieval tasks. The execution platform 110 is coupled to storage platform 104 of the cloud storage platform 104. The storage platform 104 comprises multiple data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N. In some embodiments, the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N are cloud-based storage devices located in one or more geographic locations. For example, the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N may be part of a public cloud infrastructure or a private cloud infrastructure. The data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N may be hard disk drives (HDDs), solid state drives (SSDs), storage clusters, Amazon S3™ storage systems, or any other data storage technology. Additionally, the cloud storage platform 104 may include distributed file systems (such as Hadoop Distributed File Systems (HDFS)), object storage systems, and the like.

As further shown, the storage platform 104 includes clock service 130 which can be contacted to fetch a number that will be greater than any number previously returned, such as one that correlates to the current time. Clock service 130 is discussed further herein below with respect to embodiments of the subject system.

The execution platform 110 comprises a plurality of compute nodes. A set of processes on a compute node executes a query plan compiled by the compute service manager 108. The set of processes can include: a first process to execute the query plan; a second process to monitor and delete cache files using a least recently used (LRU) policy and implement an out of memory (00M) error mitigation process; a third process that extracts health information from process logs and status to send back to the compute service manager 108; a fourth process to establish communication with the compute service manager 108 after a system boot; and a fifth process to handle all communication with a compute cluster for a given job provided by the compute service manager 108 and to communicate information back to the compute service manager 108 and other compute nodes of the execution platform 110.

In some embodiments, communication links between elements of the computing environment 100 are implemented via one or more data communication networks. These data communication networks may utilize any communication protocol and any type of communication medium. In some embodiments, the data communication networks are a combination of two or more data communication networks (or sub-Networks) coupled to one another. In alternative embodiments, these communication links are implemented using any type of communication medium and any communication protocol.

The compute service manager 108, metadata database(s) 112, execution platform 110, and storage platform 104, are shown in FIG. 1 as individual discrete components. However, each of the compute service manager 108, metadata database(s) 112, execution platform 110, and storage platform 104 may be implemented as a distributed system (e.g., distributed across multiple systems/platforms at multiple geographic locations). Additionally, each of the compute service manager 108, metadata database(s) 112, execution platform 110, and storage platform 104 can be scaled up or down (independently of one another) depending on changes to the requests received and the changing needs of the network-based database system 102. Thus, in the described embodiments, the network-based database system 102 is dynamic and supports regular changes to meet the current data processing needs.

During typical operation, the network-based database system 102 processes multiple jobs determined by the compute service manager 108. These jobs are scheduled and managed by the compute service manager 108 to determine when and how to execute the job. For example, the compute service manager 108 may divide the job into multiple discrete tasks (or transactions as discussed further herein) and may determine what data is needed to execute each of the multiple discrete tasks. The compute service manager 108 may assign each of the multiple discrete tasks to one or more nodes of the execution platform 110 to process the task. The compute service manager 108 may determine what data is needed to process a task and further determine which nodes within the execution platform 110 are best suited to process the task. Some nodes may have already cached the data needed to process the task and, therefore, be a good candidate for processing the task. Metadata stored in a metadata database 112 assists the compute service manager 108 in determining which nodes in the execution platform 110 have already cached at least a portion of the data needed to process the task. One or more nodes in the execution platform 110 process the task using data cached by the nodes and, if necessary, data retrieved from the cloud storage platform 104. It is desirable to retrieve as much data as possible from caches within the execution platform 110 because the retrieval speed is typically much faster than retrieving data from the cloud storage platform 104.

As shown in FIG. 1 , the computing environment 100 separates the execution platform 110 from the storage platform 104. In this arrangement, the processing resources and cache resources in the execution platform 110 operate independently of the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N in the cloud storage platform 104. Thus, the computing resources and cache resources are not restricted to specific data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N. Instead, all computing resources and all cache resources may retrieve data from, and store data to, any of the data storage resources in the cloud storage platform 104.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating components of the compute service manager 108, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 2 , the compute service manager 108 includes an access manager 202 and a credential management system 204 coupled to an access metadata database 206, which is an example of the metadata database(s) 112. Access manager 202 handles authentication and authorization tasks for the systems described herein. The credential management system 204 facilitates use of remote stored credentials (e.g., credentials stored in one of the remote credential stores 118-1 to 118-N) to access external resources such as data resources in a remote storage device. As used herein, the remote storage devices may also be referred to as “persistent storage devices” or “shared storage devices.” For example, the credential management system 204 may create and maintain remote credential store definitions and credential objects (e.g., in the access metadata database 206). A remote credential store definition identifies a remote credential store (e.g., one or more of the remote credential stores 118-1 to 118-N) and includes access information to access security credentials from the remote credential store. A credential object identifies one or more security credentials using non-sensitive information (e.g., text strings) that are to be retrieved from a remote credential store for use in accessing an external resource. When a request invoking an external resource is received at run time, the credential management system 204 and access manager 202 use information stored in the access metadata database 206 (e.g., a credential object and a credential store definition) to retrieve security credentials used to access the external resource from a remote credential store.

A request processing service 208 manages received data storage requests and data retrieval requests (e.g., jobs to be performed on database data). For example, the request processing service 208 may determine the data to process a received query (e.g., a data storage request or data retrieval request). The data may be stored in a cache within the execution platform 110 or in a data storage device in storage platform 104.

A management console service 210 supports access to various systems and processes by administrators and other system managers. Additionally, the management console service 210 may receive a request to execute a job and monitor the workload on the system.

The compute service manager 108 also includes a job compiler 212, a job optimizer 214 and a job executor 216. The job compiler 212 parses a job into multiple discrete tasks and generates the execution code for each of the multiple discrete tasks. The job optimizer 214 determines the best method to execute the multiple discrete tasks based on the data that needs to be processed. The job optimizer 214 also handles various data pruning operations and other data optimization techniques to improve the speed and efficiency of executing the job. The job executor 216 executes the execution code for jobs received from a queue or determined by the compute service manager 108.

A job scheduler and coordinator 218 sends received jobs to the appropriate services or systems for compilation, optimization, and dispatch to the execution platform 110. For example, jobs may be prioritized and then processed in that prioritized order. In an embodiment, the job scheduler and coordinator 218 determines a priority for internal jobs that are scheduled by the compute service manager 108 with other “outside” jobs such as user queries that may be scheduled by other systems in the database (e.g., the storage platform 104) but may utilize the same processing resources in the execution platform 110. In some embodiments, the job scheduler and coordinator 218 identifies or assigns particular nodes in the execution platform 110 to process particular tasks. A virtual warehouse manager 220 manages the operation of multiple virtual warehouses implemented in the execution platform 110. For example, the virtual warehouse manager 220 may generate query plans for executing received queries.

Additionally, the compute service manager 108 includes a configuration and metadata manager 222, which manages the information related to the data stored in the remote data storage devices and in the local buffers (e.g., the buffers in execution platform 110). The configuration and metadata manager 222 uses metadata to determine which data files need to be accessed to retrieve data for processing a particular task or job. A monitor and workload analyzer 224 oversee processes performed by the compute service manager 108 and manages the distribution of tasks (e.g., workload) across the virtual warehouses and execution nodes in the execution platform 110. The monitor and workload analyzer 224 also redistributes tasks, as needed, based on changing workloads throughout the network-based database system 102 and may further redistribute tasks based on a user (e.g., “external”) query workload that may also be processed by the execution platform 110. The configuration and metadata manager 222 and the monitor and workload analyzer 224 are coupled to a data storage device 226. Data storage device 226 in FIG. 2 represents any data storage device within the network-based database system 102. For example, data storage device 226 may represent buffers in execution platform 110, storage devices in storage platform 104, or any other storage device.

As described in embodiments herein, the compute service manager 108 validates all communication from an execution platform (e.g., the execution platform 110) to validate that the content and context of that communication are consistent with the task(s) known to be assigned to the execution platform. For example, an instance of the execution platform executing a query A should not be allowed to request access to data-source D (e.g., data storage device 226) that is not relevant to query A. Similarly, a given execution node (e.g., execution node 302-1 may need to communicate with another execution node (e.g., execution node 302-2), and should be disallowed from communicating with a third execution node (e.g., execution node 312-1) and any such illicit communication can be recorded (e.g., in a log or other location). Also, the information stored on a given execution node is restricted to data relevant to the current query and any other data is unusable, rendered so by destruction or encryption where the key is unavailable.

FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating components of the execution platform 110, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. As shown in FIG. 3 , the execution platform 110 includes multiple virtual warehouses, including virtual warehouse 1, virtual warehouse 2, and virtual warehouse n. Each virtual warehouse includes multiple execution nodes that each include a data cache and a processor. The virtual warehouses can execute multiple tasks in parallel by using the multiple execution nodes. As discussed herein, the execution platform 110 can add new virtual warehouses and drop existing virtual warehouses in real-time based on the current processing needs of the systems and users. This flexibility allows the execution platform 110 to quickly deploy large amounts of computing resources when needed without being forced to continue paying for those computing resources when they are no longer needed. All virtual warehouses can access data from any data storage device (e.g., any storage device in cloud storage platform 104).

Although each virtual warehouse shown in FIG. 3 includes three execution nodes, a particular virtual warehouse may include any number of execution nodes. Further, the number of execution nodes in a virtual warehouse is dynamic, such that new execution nodes are created when additional demand is present, and existing execution nodes are deleted when they are no longer necessary.

Each virtual warehouse is capable of accessing any of the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N shown in FIG. 1 . Thus, the virtual warehouses are not necessarily assigned to a specific data storage device 120-1 to 120-N and, instead, can access data from any of the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N within the cloud storage platform 104. Similarly, each of the execution nodes shown in FIG. 3 can access data from any of the data storage devices 120-1 to 120-N. In some embodiments, a particular virtual warehouse or a particular execution node may be temporarily assigned to a specific data storage device, but the virtual warehouse or execution node may later access data from any other data storage device.

In the example of FIG. 3 , virtual warehouse 1 includes three execution nodes 302-1, 302-2, and 302-N. Execution node 302-1 includes a cache 304-1 and a processor 306-1. Execution node 302-2 includes a cache 304-2 and a processor 306-2. Execution node 302-N includes a cache 304-N and a processor 306-N. Each execution node 302-1, 302-2, and 302-N is associated with processing one or more data storage and/or data retrieval tasks. For example, a virtual warehouse may handle data storage and data retrieval tasks associated with an internal service, such as a clustering service, a materialized view refresh service, a file compaction service, a storage procedure service, or a file upgrade service. In other implementations, a particular virtual warehouse may handle data storage and data retrieval tasks associated with a particular data storage system or a particular category of data.

Similar to virtual warehouse 1 discussed above, virtual warehouse 2 includes three execution nodes 312-1, 312-2, and 312-N. Execution node 312-1 includes a cache 314-1 and a processor 316-1. Execution node 312-2 includes a cache 314-2 and a processor 316-2. Execution node 312-N includes a cache 314-N and a processor 316-N. Additionally, virtual warehouse 3 includes three execution nodes 322-1, 322-2, and 322-N. Execution node 322-1 includes a cache 324-1 and a processor 326-1. Execution node 322-2 includes a cache 324-2 and a processor 326-2. Execution node 322-N includes a cache 324-N and a processor 326-N.

In some embodiments, the execution nodes shown in FIG. 3 are stateless with respect to the data being cached by the execution nodes. For example, these execution nodes do not store or otherwise maintain state information about the execution node or the data being cached by a particular execution node. Thus, in the event of an execution node failure, the failed node can be transparently replaced by another node. Since there is no state information associated with the failed execution node, the new (replacement) execution node can easily replace the failed node without concern for recreating a particular state.

Although the execution nodes shown in FIG. 3 each includes one data cache and one processor, alternative embodiments may include execution nodes containing any number of processors and any number of caches. Additionally, the caches may vary in size among the different execution nodes. The caches shown in FIG. 3 store, in the local execution node, data that was retrieved from one or more data storage devices in cloud storage platform 104. Thus, the caches reduce or eliminate the bottleneck problems occurring in platforms that consistently retrieve data from remote storage systems. Instead of repeatedly accessing data from the remote storage devices, the systems and methods described herein access data from the caches in the execution nodes, which is significantly faster and avoids the bottleneck problem discussed above. In some embodiments, the caches are implemented using high-speed memory devices that provide fast access to the cached data. Each cache can store data from any of the storage devices in the cloud storage platform 104.

Further, the cache resources and computing resources may vary between different execution nodes. For example, one execution node may contain significant computing resources and minimal cache resources, making the execution node useful for tasks that require significant computing resources. Another execution node may contain significant cache resources and minimal computing resources, making this execution node useful for tasks that require caching of large amounts of data. Yet another execution node may contain cache resources providing faster input-output operations, useful for tasks that require fast scanning of large amounts of data. In some embodiments, the cache resources and computing resources associated with a particular execution node are determined when the execution node is created, based on the expected tasks to be performed by the execution node.

Additionally, the cache resources and computing resources associated with a particular execution node may change over time based on changing tasks performed by the execution node. For example, an execution node may be assigned more processing resources if the tasks performed by the execution node become more processor-intensive. Similarly, an execution node may be assigned more cache resources if the tasks performed by the execution node require a larger cache capacity.

Although virtual warehouses 1, 2, and n are associated with the same execution platform 110, the virtual warehouses may be implemented using multiple computing systems at multiple geographic locations. For example, virtual warehouse 1 can be implemented by a computing system at a first geographic location, while virtual warehouses 2 and n are implemented by another computing system at a second geographic location. In some embodiments, these different computing systems are cloud-based computing systems maintained by one or more different entities.

Additionally, each virtual warehouse is shown in FIG. 3 as having multiple execution nodes. The multiple execution nodes associated with each virtual warehouse may be implemented using multiple computing systems at multiple geographic locations. For example, an instance of virtual warehouse 1 implements execution nodes 302-1 and 302-2 on one computing platform at a geographic location and implements execution node 302-N at a different computing platform at another geographic location. Selecting particular computing systems to implement an execution node may depend on various factors, such as the level of resources needed for a particular execution node (e.g., processing resource requirements and cache requirements), the resources available at particular computing systems, communication capabilities of networks within a geographic location or between geographic locations, and which computing systems are already implementing other execution nodes in the virtual warehouse.

Execution platform 110 is also fault tolerant. For example, if one virtual warehouse fails, that virtual warehouse is quickly replaced with a different virtual warehouse at a different geographic location.

A particular execution platform 110 may include any number of virtual warehouses. Additionally, the number of virtual warehouses in a particular execution platform is dynamic, such that new virtual warehouses are created when additional processing and/or caching resources are needed. Similarly, existing virtual warehouses may be deleted when the resources associated with the virtual warehouse are no longer necessary.

In some embodiments, the virtual warehouses may operate on the same data in cloud storage platform 104, but each virtual warehouse has its own execution nodes with independent processing and caching resources. This configuration allows requests on different virtual warehouses to be processed independently and with no interference between the requests. This independent processing, combined with the ability to dynamically add and remove virtual warehouses, supports the addition of new processing capacity for new users without impacting the performance observed by the existing users.

FIG. 4 is a computing environment 400 conceptually illustrating an example software architecture for managing and executing concurrent transactions on a database system (e.g., the network-based database system 102), which can be performed by a given execution node of the execution platform 110, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. In an embodiment, a process flow is performed by a transaction manager that is configured to manage and execute transactions as described further herein.

As shown, the transaction manager 440 is included in the compute service manager 108. The transaction manager 440 receives a job 410 that may be divided into one or more discrete transactions 420-425, e.g., transaction 0, transaction 1, transaction 2, transaction 3, and so forth through transaction (n). In an embodiment, each transaction includes one or more tasks or operations (e.g., read operation, write operation, database statement, user defined function, and the like) to perform. The transaction manager 440 receives the job at 450 and determines transactions at 452 that may be carried out to execute the job 410. The transaction manager 440 is configured to determine the one or more discrete transactions, such as transaction 0, transaction 1, transaction 2, transaction 3, and so forth, based on applicable rules and/or parameters. The transaction manager 440 assigns transactions at 454.

As further shown, the transaction manager 440 is configured to concurrently process multiple jobs that can be performed by the execution platform 110. In an example, the transaction manager 440 can receive a second job 430 or a third job 435, each of which include respective discrete transactions that are to be performed on the execution platform 110. Each of the transactions may be executed concurrently by the execution platform 110 in which different operations are performed (e.g., a respective read operation or write operation are executed from each of the transactions by the execution platform 110).

In an implementation, the job 410, including the respective transactions therein, is carried out by the transaction manager 440 which can perform the responsibilities of a query manager (e.g., processing query statements and operations, and the like). As shown, the transaction manager 440 may have multiple threads, including, for example, transaction manager threads 442A, 442B, 442C, and so forth. The transaction manager 440 may assign the job 410, including the multiple discrete transactions, to a particular virtual warehouse of the execution platform 110. Based on this assignment, the transaction manager 440 can send the job 410, including the multiple discrete transactions, to the assigned virtual warehouse for execution. Alternatively, the transaction manager 440 can send a subset of the transactions included in the job 410 for execution by the execution platform 110.

In an embodiment, as described further herein, the transaction manager 440 can perform operations to process transactions (e.g., OLTP) that may be executing concurrently, while handling conflicts and avoiding starvation of resources. Further, as described further herein, the transaction manager 440 handles conflicts between multiple transactions and concurrency issues that can arise when multiple transactions are executing in parallel on the execution platform 110. As further shown, the execution platform 110 communicates with the storage platform 104, which provides a distributed database (e.g., FoundationDB, and the like), where data can be read and written in connection with performing the transactions.

In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 schedules and manages the execution of transactions on behalf of a client account. The transaction manager 440 may schedule any arbitrary SQL query included in a given transaction. The transaction manager 440 may assume a role to schedule the job 410 as if it is the client account rather than as an internal account or other special account. The transaction manager 440 may embody the role of, for example, an account administrator or a role having the (smallest) scope necessary to complete the job 410. In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 embodies the role that owns the object that is the target of the job 410 (e.g. for a cluster, the table being clustered is the target).

In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 determines transactions at 452 and assigns transactions at 454 that must be performed to fully execute the job 410. In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 assigns ordering constraints to any number of the one or more discrete transactions, where applicable. Depending on the constraints of the job 410, the transaction manager 440 may determine that one or more of multiple discrete transactions must be serialized and executed in a particular order.

In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 generates a report indicating when the job 410 is scheduled to be executed and how much computing resources are estimated to be tied up executing the job 410. The transaction manager 440 may alert a client account when the job 410 is being executed.

The subject technology provides concurrency control and isolation for executing transactions against (e.g., a series of SQL Statements within a SQL Transaction) against linearizable storage (e.g., a linearizable key-value store). A transaction as referred to herein includes a group of operations executed atomically. In an example, such transactions may include read and write operations but can also include operations such as increment, decrement, compare-and-swap, and the like. Further, it is appreciated that linearizable storage may include any type of distributed database (e.g., Apache HBase).

The following discussion relates to transactions in a given distributed database system. In an example, the transaction manager 440 utilizes a linearizable storage, provided by the storage platform 104, for managing and processing transactions as described herein. In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 implements a read committed model for performing transactions. As referred to herein, a read committed model can refer to a model that ensures that all read operations performed in a given transaction sees a consistent snapshot of the database (e.g., reading a last set of committed values that existed when the read operation commenced), and the transaction itself successfully commits only if no updates that the transaction has made results in write-write conflicts with any concurrent transactions.

As discussed further herein, the transaction manager 440 implements a two-level transaction hierarchy, where a top-level transaction corresponds to a SQL transaction, and a nested transaction corresponds to a SQL statement within the parent SQL transaction. A given nested transaction can perform operations, such as reads and writes, and can perform a rollback and restart execution zero or more times before succeeding. Upon transaction commit, write operations can become visible, and write locks held by each contained statement can be released.

As mentioned before, the subject system provides concurrency control and isolation for executing a series of SQL Statements within a SQL Transaction against a linearizable storage. As discussed further herein, a transaction manager (e.g., transaction manager 440) is configured to provide a concurrency control mechanism that can be understood as a combination of multi-version concurrency control for read operations (MVCC) and locking for write operations. The subject system provides techniques for read committed isolation where each statement may execute against a different snapshot of the database (e.g., the storage platform 104), with write locks held until transaction commit.

In an embodiment, the linearizable storage as described herein enables each operation to execute atomically between invocation and response. As an example, such a linearizable key-value store ensures that operations execute in an atomic manner consistent with a “real-time” ordering of those operations e.g., when operation A completes before operation B begins, operation B should take effect after operation A. In the context of a database, a first write operation to a row in the table must take effect before a second write or read operation to the same row in the table if the second operation was issued after the first completed.

The examples described herein relate to linearizable storage such as a linearizable database, including, for example, NoSQL systems, and the like. A given NoSQL database refers to a database that stores data in a format other than a tabular format, and can store data differently than in relational tables. Further, Uber's Schemaless is an example of building linearizable Key-Value storage via having a “key” and “value” column in a relational table. Other examples of linearizable databases are: HBase, RocksDB, TiKV, Redis, Etcd.

Some examples of optimizations provided by the subject system include utilizing restricted transactional capabilities offered by some embodiments of storage platform 104, such as FoundationDB, that can be leveraged to enable a more efficient transaction implementation. For example, in a write(/lock/delete) protocol, a write operation is performed, and then a read operation is done to check for (1) any write operation that happened before the write request was submitted (2) any other write operation was submitted concurrently with the write operation that was serialized before. The following example illustrates the above:

-   -   T1 starts statement S1     -   S1 starts a FoundationDB Transaction, and uses its Read Version         as the Read Timestamp     -   S1 wishes to write object X, so it first reads object X as of         the Read Timestamp     -   Finding no conflicts, S1 writes X, using a timestamped operation         to embed the commit timestamp in the key and setting         IsCommitEmbedded.     -   S1 sets a read conflict range on the FoundationDB transaction         for all keys with a prefix of X     -   S1 writes a transaction status entry for ID, directly setting it         to committed.     -   T1 commits the FoundationDB Transaction.     -   If the transaction commits, then there were no concurrent         conflicting transactions.     -   If the transaction is aborted, then there was a concurrency         conflicting transaction for one of the writes that were done.         None of S1's writes, nor the transaction status entry will be         persisted. S1 must now restart in the slow path.

In an example, a “read version” refers to a “version” or state of the database that corresponds to when a last operation was successfully committed to the database.

The following relates to a discussion of strict serializability. Whereas linearizability makes a “real-time” ordering and atomicity promise about single operations, strict serializability makes a “real-time” ordering and atomicity promise about groups of operations. In an example, the group of operations is submitted incrementally over time, with a terminal “commit” command being issued. The strictly serializable storage platform may employ techniques such as pessimistic lock-based exclusion or an optimistic validation phase to enable this functionality. In this example, the group of operations is referred to as a transaction as mentioned herein. The subject system can impose restrictions on the transaction, such as the number, size, or duration of the operations, and always reject transactions that exceed these limits.

In an embodiment, read operations may be optimized in the following manner. When reading with a given read timestamp, it may not be feasible for any transaction started after the read timestamp to commit before the read timestamp. Thus, if the Transaction ID is set to be the same as the first statement's read timestamp, then instead of reading [X.0, X.inf], the subject system can read [X.0, X.readTimestamp]. Consequently, this approach can make read operations for old or frequently written data more efficient.

In an embodiment, the subject system implements a two-level transaction hierarchy, where the top-level transaction corresponds to a SQL Transaction, and the nested transaction (referred to as a “StatementContext”) corresponds to a SQL statement within the parent SQL Transaction. A given StatementContext performs read and write operations and may be instructed to perform a rollback and restart execution zero or more times before succeeding. In an example, transactions control the collective visibility of all write operations from successful statements. Upon transaction commit, all write operations become visible, and all write locks held by each contained statement are released.

In an embodiment, each object key is associated with a stamp that uniquely identifies a single execution attempt of a statement, which can be by appending a three-part tuple of (Transaction ID, statementNumber, restartCount). The higher order component is the transaction identifier assigned to the SQL-level transaction. The statementNumber identifies the SQL statement within the SQL-level BEGIN/COMMIT block. The restart count tracks which statement restart attempt generated this write operations. A StatementContext is instantiated with this stamp, and applies it to all writes performed through the StatementContext instance.

Stamping keys this way has a number of desirable properties. First, if key1<key2, then key1.suffix1<key2.suffix2, regardless of the values of suffix1 and suffix2. If key1==key2, then the transactionID component of the suffix allows us to resolve the commit status of the object to determine its visibility to the statement. If transactionID1==transactionID2, then Statement Number allows statements to see writes performed by previous statements within the same transaction. The restartCount component of the suffix enables the system to detect and delete obsolete versions of the object that had been left around when a statement has to be restarted.

In a similar fashion each execution of a statement is given a three-part identifier consisting of the statement's readTimestamp (RTS) and the current values of statementNumber (SN) and restartCount (RC). This approach ensures that each statement that is part of the execution of a SQL statement (or more generally a SQL Transaction), sees either data committed before the SQL statement started or by data written or updated by the transaction itself.

In an embodiment, the transaction manager employs a Transaction Status Table (TST) to keep track of committed and aborted transactions. The TST is a persistent hashmap that maps Transaction ID to its metadata, most notably a list of finalized statement numbers and their final restart count, and the commit outcome including the transaction's commit timestamp (CTS). Transactions that are in progress do not exist in the Transaction Status Table. In an embodiment, the TST can be stored in the storage platform 104, or within memory or cache of the execution platform 110.

The following discussion relates to a read protocol that is utilized by the transaction manager 440.

In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 uses a read committed transaction isolation level, and each statement may be run with a different read timestamp. In an example, the read request for a given key (or a range of keys) is implemented by executing a linearizable storage read call for all keys with X as their prefix. The call returns versions of X with their stamps and values. The read method returns either the latest version of X made by a transaction that committed before the SQL statement started or which was written by the most recent statement of the transaction itself that was not canceled (if any).

The following discussion relates to a write protocol that is utilized by the transaction manager 440.

In an embodiment, the write protocol checks both for WW (write-write) conflicts and WW deadlocks. The following example describes a single transaction and no conflicts. Assume that object X initially has a stamp of TXN1.0.0 and was committed at timestamp 10. In the following example, it should be understood that the following transactional steps described further below can be done within one transaction, and collectively committed. On failure, or upon exceeding the limitations of the underlying transactional system, the execution can fall back to issuing the operations individually as described in further detail below.

T2 starts and creates S1 of StatementContext(ID=TXN2, Statement Number=1, restartCount=0)

Assume that the constructor obtains a read timestamp from the linearizable storage of 15 by contacting the clock service 130. As mentioned before, the clock service 130 is a component of the storage platform 104 which can be contacted to fetch a number that will be greater than any number previously returned, such as one that correlates to the current time. In an embodiment, clock service 130 is provided separately and is independently contactable from the linearizable storage, or can be integrated into the linearizable storage such that the clock value may be inserted into a written value. The latter operation will be referred to as a timestamped write.

To update value of X, the following sequence of actions is performed in an embodiment:

{  S1 does a linearizable storage write for X.TXN2.1.0 with a value of 100  // The next step is for S1 to check for WW (write-write) conflicts by  checking whether there is  // another transaction that has updated X between the RTS and S1's  write.  S1 issues the range read [X.0, X.inf] to obtain the set all versions of X  and  their stamps  The read returns [X.TXN1.0.0, X.TXN2.1.0].  S1 looks up TXN1 in the Transaction Status Table, finds a commit  timestamp of 10.  10 is earlier than our read timestamp of 15, so it is not a conflict.  S1 ignores [X.TXN2.1.0] as it belongs to S1  // Assume for now, there were no conflicts detected  S1 finalizes, and records (statement number=1, restart count=0) into the  transaction  status table for TXN2 } T2 commits. This will cause the Transaction Status Table record to be updated in linearizable storage to reflect that TXN2 is now committed and its commit timestamp of 20.

At this point there will be two versions of X, one stamped with TXN1.0.0 and the other TXN2.1.0. Subsequent transactions that read X can determine if this new version of X was written by a committed transaction by reading the transaction status record, and determine the CTS of the transaction.

The write protocol for transaction T can now be stated.

In an implementation, each row (object) updated requires two separate linearizable storage transactions:

-   -   1) The first linearizable storage transaction of T inserts a new         version of the object with its key X suffixed with three-part         suffix (T.ID, T.statementNumber, T.restartCount).     -   2) The second linearizable storage transaction issues a range         read with the prefix “X.” to obtain the SCT (set of conflicting         transactions). The result set is a list of committed or active         transactions that wrote (or are writing) new versions of X.

There are a number of possible distinct outcomes to this linearizable storage read call that are evaluated in the following order:

-   -   1) SCT is empty in which case T is trivially allowed to proceed.     -   2) SCT is not empty, but for all Ti in SCT, Ti has committed         before T's read timestamp, and thus are not WW (write-write)         conflicts. T may proceed.     -   3) SCT is not empty; for all Ti in SCT, Ti is committed; and         there exists a Ti in SCT, such that its CTN is greater than T's         read timestamp. T is permitted to restart without delay.     -   4) SCT is not empty, and for one or more Ti in SCT, Ti has not         yet committed or aborted. T must wait for all transactions in         SCT to complete before restarting the current statement.     -   5) SCT is not empty, and for one or more Ti in SCT,         Ti.TransactionID is the same as our own transaction ID, and         Ti.StatementCount is less than our current statement count. This         means that currently the lock is held, as a previous statement         took it and successfully finished its execution. T may proceed.     -   6) SCT is not empty, and for one or more Ti in SCT,         TI.TransactionID is the same as our own transaction ID,         Ti.StatementCount is the same as our own StatementCount, and         Ti.RestartCount is less than our own restart count. This is a         lock from a previous execution of our own transaction, thus T         holds the lock on this row, and T may proceed.

For all cases, the object (X.Stamp, Value) will be left in the database (e.g., the storage platform 104). For (3) and (4) which require restarts, the object is left to serve as a write lock. In general, all tentative writes for an object X will form a queue of write locks. (5) and (6) illustrate the cases where previously left write locks allow subsequent statements or restarts of a statement to recognize that they already hold the lock that they wish to take.

The following discussion describes an example that illustrates a write-write (WW) conflict. A write-write conflict, which is also understood as overwriting uncommitted data, refers to a computational anomaly associated with interleaved execution of transactions. To simplify the example, stamps are omitted. Assume that before either T1 or T2 starts that object X has a value of 500, a stamp of TXN1.0.0, and a CTN of 10.

-   -   T1 starts and gets a read timestamp of 15     -   T2 starts and gets a read timestamp of 20     -   T2 writes (key=X.T2, value=100)     -   T2 issues a linearizable storage read with range [X.0, X. Inf].         The set SCT will be empty so T2 continues     -   T1 writes (key=X.T1, value=50)     -   T1 issues a linearizable storage read with range [X.0, X. Inf].         The set SCT will contain T2 so T1 must restart     -   T2 successfully commits. T1's CTN for X will be >20. Assume it         is 21         After waiting until T2 either commits or aborts, Ti restarts the         statement with a read TS>21.

The following discussion relates to a delete protocol utilized by the transaction manager 440.

In an embodiment, delete operations are implemented as a write of a sentinel tombstone value; otherwise, delete operations employ the same protocol as write operations. When a read operation determines that the most recently committed key is a tombstone, it considers that key to be non-existent.

The following discussion relates to a lock protocol utilized by the transaction manager 440.

To support a query statement of SELECT . . . FOR UPDATE, the transaction manager API offers StatementContext::lock(Key), which allows rows to be locked without writing a value to them. The implementation of lock( ) follows the write protocol, except that it writes a special sentinel value to indicate the absence of a value (distinct from SQL NULL). A SELECT . . . FOR UPDATE statement may also be forced to restart several times before the statement finishes successfully. Once it does, subsequent statements in the transaction will recognize the existence of this key as an indication that they hold the lock (in accordance with cases (5) and (6) above). All reads can ignore the key as a write.

The following discussion relates to determining whether to commit, abort, or restart a given transaction which can be determined by the transaction manager 440.

When a transaction finishes its execution, it will either have an empty SCT, indicating that the commit can proceed, or an SCT with one or more conflicting transactions, indicating that the transaction will need to restart.

When a statement is restarted, all writes stamped with a lower restartCount are left in the database (e.g., the storage platform 104) as provisional write locks for the next execution. The next execution of the statement might write a different set of keys. The set difference between the first and second execution form a set of orphaned writes that must be removed and never become visible. The statement itself may not be relied upon to always be able to clean up its own orphaned writes, as in the event of a process crash, the location of the previous writes will have been forgotten. Finalizing statements and recording the restart count of the successful execution promises that only the results of one execution will ever become visible, and permits orphaned writes to be lazily cleaned up.

A transaction is committed, and all of its writes made visible, by inserting its Transaction ID into the Transaction Status Table. The commit timestamp is filled in by the clock service 130 or directly by the distributed database (e.g., FoundationDB), such that it is higher than any previously assigned read or commit timestamps. All writes must have completed before a statement may be finalized, and all statements must be finalized before the transaction may be committed.

A transaction is aborted by inserting its Transaction ID into the Transaction Status Table, with its transaction outcome set as aborted. The list of finalized statements and their restart counts will be reset to an empty list. The insertion into the Transaction Status Table will make the abort outcome visible to all conflicting transactions, and all writes performed by finalized statements may be proactively or lazily removed from the database (e.g., the storage platform 104).

When a statement tries to finalize with a non-empty SCT, it waits for commit outcomes to be persisted to the Transaction Status Table for all conflicting transactions. Once all conflicting transactions have committed or aborted, then the transaction will begin its restart attempt.

The following discussion relates to an API (e.g., the transaction manager API as referred to below) that can be utilized (e.g., by a given client device) to send commands and requests to the transaction manager 440.

A SQL transaction contains a sequence of one or more SQL statements. Each SQL statement is executed as a nested transaction, as implemented by the transaction manager StatementContext class. Each transaction manager statement itself is executed as one or more database transactions.

In an embodiment, the transaction manager API is divided into two parts: 1) the data layer, which provides a read and write API to the transaction execution processes; and 2) the transaction layer, which provides, to the compute service manager 108, an API to orchestrate the transaction lifecycle. In an implementation, transactions operate at a READ COMMITTED isolation level and implement MVCC on top of the distributed database (e.g., storage platform 104) to avoid taking any read locks.

Consider the following example SQL query:

-   -   Update emp.Salary=emp.Salary*1.1 where emp.Dept=“shoe”;

In an example, an instance of the StatementContext class will be created to execute this SQL statement. The constructor contacts the linearizable storage transaction manager to begin a linearizable storage transaction and obtain a linearizable storage STN which is then stored in the readTimestamp variable.

The Update operation then executes across any number of execution nodes, all using the same StatementContext instance. In an example, a function rangeRead( ) will be used to scan the base table, or an index on Dept, for the tuples to update. A series of write( ) calls will be made to update the salary of all matching employees.

A call to finalize( ) will return CONFLICT if the statement encountered any conflicts during its execution, to indicate that re-execution is needed. The key to restarts making progress is that the first execution of the statement will have the side effect of, in effect, setting write locks on the objects being updated. This ensures that when the statement is re-executed the necessary writes locks have already been obtained and the statement will generally (but not always).

Next, consider an example illustrating Write-Write conflicts between 3 transactions:

T1 starts S1 with timestamp 10 T2 starts S2 with timestamp 20 T3 starts S3 with timestamp 30 S1 writes X S2 writes Y S3 writes Z S1 writes Y, and notes the conflict with T2 S2 writes Z, and notes the conflict with T3 S3 writes X, and notes the conflict with T1

In this case described above, three transactions are involved in a deadlock. Each statement believes that it must restart and wait for the execution of the previous transaction to finish. No transaction has the complete information to know that it is involved in a deadlock.

Thus, when a statement fails to finalize due to conflicts, it instead writes its conflict set into the database (e.g., the storage platform 104). These conflict sets may be read by all other transactions, allowing them to detect a cycle in the waits-for graph, indicating that they're involved in a deadlock.

In database systems, a deadlock can refer to a situation where two or more transactions are waiting for one another to give up locks. As an example, deadlocks can be handled by deadlock detection or prevention in some embodiments. The following discussion relates to example mechanisms for handling deadlocks utilizing distributed approaches that do not require a centralized deadlock handling component or implementation. For example, in an implementation, a particular execution node, (e.g., execution node 302-1 and the like) in the execution platform 110 can perform at least some of the following operations described below.

Deadlock detection: A basic idea of deadlock detection is to detect a deadlock after the deadlock occurs such that that a particular transaction can be aborted. This can be done by finding cycles in a wait-for graph. Depending on how deadlock detection is performed, deadlock detection can be classified as:

-   -   Online detection: whenever a transaction wishes to acquire a         lock, it adds an edge to the wait-for graph. The transaction is         aborted if this new edge will cause a cycle.     -   Offline detection: the system periodically collects the pending         lock requests from all transactions to construct a wait-for         graph and perform cycle detection.         Deadlock prevention: A basic idea of deadlock prevention is to         enforce some restrictions on locking so that deadlocks can never         happen. Example techniques include:     -   Timeout: a transaction is assumed to be involved in a deadlock         if its lock request cannot be granted after a certain time         period, e.g., 5 seconds.     -   Non-blocking 2PL: whenever a conflict happens, a transaction is         aborted immediately.     -   Wait-die: when a transaction Ti requests a lock that is held by         Tj, Ti is only allowed to wait if Ti is older than Tj. Otherwise         Ti is aborted immediately.     -   Wound-wait: when a transaction Ti requests a lock that is held         by Tj, Tj is aborted if Ti has a higher priority than Tj.         Otherwise, Ti will wait.

In embodiments, the subject technology implements a distributed database (e.g., storage platform 104) for executing distributed transactions, and utilizes locking for concurrency control where any deadlocks are handled in a distributed manner by a particular execution node executing a particular transaction (e.g., execution node 302-1 and the like).

In some embodiments, the subject technology provides the following:

-   -   No false deadlocks: Deadlocks generally represent some bugs in         the user's application code. By providing accurate and         informative deadlock information, embodiments of the subject         technology enables a user to fix these deadlocks.     -   Distributed/decentralized deadlock handling: transaction manager         440 is designed for executing distributed transactions in the         cloud. In an embodiment, the transaction manager 440 creates one         job (with one or more execution node workers) to execute a         transaction. It can be desirable that each transaction handles         deadlocks independently without requiring a centralized         transaction manager.

The following discussion describes a deadlock detection and resolution protocol for the subject technology to meet the two aforementioned requirements. In order to meet the goal of no false deadlocks, the subject technology performs deadlock detection on the wait-for graph and only aborts a transaction if it finds a cycle in the graph. To meet a goal of not utilizing a centralized transaction manager, each transaction (e.g., executing on a given execution node) are able to exchange wait-for information and perform deadlock detection independently. Further, the subject technology implements a deadlock detection algorithm that is deterministic so that all transactions can unanimously agree on which transactions to abort.

In the following discussion, it is understood that statements in a transaction are executed serially e.g., one at a time. As discussed further below, the subject technology can then extend a deadlock detection protocol as described herein to support parallel statement execution.

In the discussion below, “transaction” and “statement” are used interchangeably because it is assumed that statements of a transaction will be executed serially, e.g., one at a time. In an example, the subject technology utilizes a deadlock detection and resolution protocol that enables transactions to store their wait-for information into a dedicated table in a distributed database (e.g., storage platform 104). A transaction waiting for conflicting transactions can periodically run a deterministic deadlock detection algorithm. If a transaction determines that it is a victim in a deadlock, the transaction can abort itself so that other transactions can proceed.

In some implementations, the execution platform 110 can provide deadlock handling logic 480 (e.g., deadlock handling logic 1 to deadlock handling logic N, which can correspond respectively to each transaction 420 to transaction 425) which implements the deadlock detection and resolution protocol mentioned herein, and is provided or utilized by each given execution node that is currently executing a given transaction(s). In another embodiment, each deadlock handling logic can be provided to a corresponding transaction (or statement within a transaction) for deadlock detection and resolution as described further herein.

In an embodiment, wait-for information of transactions is stored in a wait-for table in the distributed database (e.g., storage platform 104). The wait-for table includes a set of key-value pairs where both keys and values are transaction IDs. A key-value pair <Ti, Tj> means that Ti is currently waiting for Tj, e.g., there is an edge Ti→Tj in the wait-for graph.

In order to satisfy the deterministic requirement, each transaction Ti reports Ti→Tj only if Tj is the oldest conflicting transaction that Ti is waiting for (a transaction's age is determined by its transaction ID, e.g., a younger (e.g., newer) transaction will have a larger transaction ID). By ensuring that there is at most one ongoing edge from each transaction, it is straightforward to see that each transaction can participate in at most one cycle. Thus, the youngest transaction (with the largest transaction ID) can be aborted in each cycle to deterministically resolve deadlocks.

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 500 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more hardware components (e.g., one or more processors) such that the operations of the method 500 may be performed by components of network-based database system 102, such as components of the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110. Accordingly, the method 500 is described below, by way of example with reference thereto. However, it shall be appreciated that the method 500 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to deployment within the network-based database system 102.

At operation 502, the transaction manager 440 receives a first transaction, the first transaction to be executed on linearizable storage.

At operation 504, the transaction manager 440 assigns a first read version to the first transaction, the first read version indicating a first version of the linearizable storage. Alternatively, a read timestamp can be retrieved from a clock service (e.g., the clock service 130), and a transaction identifier can be assigned to the first transaction where the transaction identifier corresponds to a read start time.

At operation 506, the transaction manager 440 performs a read operation from the first transaction on a table in a database.

At operation 508, the transaction manager 440 determines a first commit version identifier corresponding to first data resulting from the read operation.

At operation 510, the transaction manager 440 determines whether a particular write operation is included in the first transaction. If the particular write operation is to be performed with the first transaction, then the transaction manager 440 proceeds to perform a method as described below in FIG. 7 .

Alternatively, when the transaction manager 440 determines that a particular write operation is absent from the first transaction, at operation 512, the transaction manager 440 proceeds to execute a different transaction (along with foregoing to perform a commit process for the first transaction), which is described, in an example, in FIG. 6 below. It is appreciated that due to the concurrency of transactions that are performed, the operations described further below in FIG. 6 can be executed at any time during the operations described in FIG. 5 above.

FIG. 6 is flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 600 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more hardware components (e.g., one or more processors) such that the operations of the method 600 may be performed by components of network-based database system 102, such as components of the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110. Accordingly, the method 600 is described below, by way of example with reference thereto. However, it shall be appreciated that the method 600 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to deployment within the network-based database system 102.

In some embodiments, the method 600 can be performed in conjunction with the method 500 as discussed above. For example, the method 600 can be performed after the operations of the method 500 or performed substantially concurrently with the method 500.

At operation 602, the transaction manager 440 receives a second transaction, the second transaction to be executed on linearizable storage.

At operation 604, the transaction manager 440 assigns the second transaction a second read version, the second read version indicating a second version of the linearizable storage.

At operation 606, the transaction manager 440 performs a second read operation from the second transaction on the table in the database.

At operation 608, the transaction manager 440 performs a second write operation from the second transaction on the table in the database.

At operation 610, the transaction manager 440 determines a particular commit version identifier corresponding to second data results from the second read operation.

At operation 612, the transaction manager 440 completes the write operation in response to the particular commit version identifier being equivalent to the first commit version identifier.

At operation 614, the transaction manager 440 assigns a second commit version identifier to second data stored to the table from the write operation, the second commit version identifier corresponding to a second version of data in the table, the second commit version identifier different than the first commit version identifier.

At operation 616, the transaction manager 440 initiates a commit process for the second transaction.

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 700 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more hardware components (e.g., one or more processors) such that the operations of the method 700 may be performed by components of network-based database system 102, such as components of the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110. Accordingly, the method 700 is described below, by way of example with reference thereto. However, it shall be appreciated that the method 700 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to deployment within the network-based database system 102.

In some embodiments, the method 700 can be performed in conjunction with the method 500 and the method 600 as discussed above. For example, the method 700 can be performed after the operations of the method 500 or the method 600 (or performed substantially concurrently therewith either method).

At operation 702, the transaction manager 440 proceeds to perform a particular write operation from the first transaction.

At operation 704, the transaction manager 440 determines that the first commit version identifier fails to match the second commit version identifier.

At operation 706, the transaction manager 440 aborts the particular write operation from the first transaction.

At operation 708, the transaction manager 440 performs a particular read operation from the first transaction on the table in the database.

At operation 710, the transaction manager 440 determines a particular commit version identifier corresponding to particular data resulting from the particular read operation.

At operation 712, the transaction manager 440 retry to perform the particular write operation from the first transaction.

At operation 714, the transaction manager 440 perform the particular write operation in response to the particular commit version identifier matching the second commit version identifier

At operation 716, the transaction manager 440 initiates a particular commit process for the first transaction.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 800 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more hardware components (e.g., one or more processors) such that the operations of the method 800 may be performed by components of network-based database system 102, such as components of the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110. Accordingly, the method 800 is described below, by way of example with reference thereto. However, it shall be appreciated that the method 800 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to deployment within the network-based database system 102.

Continuing the discussion of handling deadlocks (e.g., detection and resolution) in a distributed manner as described previously in FIG. 4 , a deadlock detection protocol in accordance with some embodiments is discussed in the following. As described before, a given transaction can be assigned to and executed by a particular execution node from the execution platform 110. For the purposes of explanation below, suppose a statement from a transaction Ti attempts to lock a set of keys S at 802.

-   -   1) If Ti has no conflicting transaction at 804, then Ti can         proceed safely at 806.     -   2) Otherwise, suppose there are some conflicting transactions T1         . . . Tn. At 808, Ti waits for these conflicting transactions         one by one, from T1 to Tn. In this example, let T1 be the oldest         transaction that Ti is currently waiting for.     -   3) If T1 finishes at 810 within time period P, then Ti proceeds         to wait for the next conflicting transaction at 818.         -   a) Ti removes Ti→T1 from the wait-for table if Ti has             performed deadlock detection     -   4) Otherwise, Ti performs deadlock detection at 812 as follows:         -   a) Ti publishes Ti→T1 to the wait-for table         -   b) Ti performs cycle detection starting from Ti             -   i) If Ti belongs to a cycle and Ti is the youngest                 transaction in the cycle at 814, Ti is aborted at 816             -   ii) Otherwise, Ti goes back to 808 and waits P seconds                 or until T1 terminates     -   5) After all conflicting transactions of Ti have completed, Ti         restarts the current statement at 820.

In some embodiments, the wait-for table is stored in distributed database as a Key-Value Table with a reserved, special name, and be maintained per-account, similarly to the Transaction Status Table. The key and value format can be:

-   -   (account ID, wait-for table name, Ti)=(statement num, restart         count, Tj)     -   A key value pair <Ti, statement num, restart count, Tj> means         that a statement with the given restart count of transaction Ti         is currently waiting for Tj. A transaction Ti adds a key-value         pair <Ti, (statement num, restart count, Tj)> to the wait-for         table if Tj is the oldest conflicting transaction of Ti. When Tj         completes or Ti aborts, the statement that publishes this         information will be responsible for removing it from the         wait-for table.

In some embodiments, any crashed transaction is eventually aborted or retried and committed. When a crashed transaction restarts, the statement could clean up the wait-for table to remove any leftover wait-for information published by this statement.

In some embodiments, a transaction waits for its conflicting transactions before it can safely restart the current statement or initiate deadlock detection. The transaction status table (TST) stores the status of each transaction, i.e., COMMITTED, ABORTED or PENDING. In addition, distributed database supports watches that allow a caller to be notified once the value of a given key changes. Thus, waiting for conflicting transactions can be implemented using watches as discussed in the following.

Suppose a statement S of a transaction Ti has a list of conflicting transactions T1 to Tn. STi waits for the oldest conflicting transaction T1 transaction to commit or abort using the following KeyValueStore API:

future<void> KeyValueStore::waitUntil(Key key, bool(optional<Value>) pred);

KeyValueStore::waitUntil(key, pred) returns a future that is completed after pred evaluates to true. In an example, KeyValueStore::waitUntil can be implemented using distributed database watches based on the following:

future<bool> KeyValueStore::conditionalWatch(Key key, bool(optional<Value>) pred);

KeyValueStore::conditionalWatch conditionally registers a watch if pred evaluates to true. It returns a future with a Boolean value to indicate whether a watch is created and the future is returned if the watch is not created or the watch has been fired.

Based on KeyValueStore::conditionalWatch, KeyValueStore::waitUntil(key, pred) can be implemented as follows:

-   -   Call KeyValueStore::watch(key, !pred) and wait for its         completion. If the return value is false, then notify the caller         directly.     -   Otherwise, call KeyValueStore::watch(key, !pred) again until the         return value becomes false.

Ti then waits for the returned future of KeyValueStore::waitUntil(key, pred) to complete for some time window P. If Ti completes, then S proceeds to wait for the next conflicting transaction T2. Otherwise, S initiates deadlock detection as discussed below.

In some embodiments, deadlock detection is implemented using the wait-for table. In an example, suppose statement S of Ti's oldest conflicting transaction is T1. During deadlock detection, statement S first writes <Ti, (S, restart count, T1)> to the wait-for table, if T1 is the oldest conflicting transaction of Ti. S then issues a series of distributed database point reads to perform graph traversal starting from Ti. For example, if there exists <Ti, T1> in the wait-for table, Ti will continue the traversal by reading T1 and so on. Eventually, there can be four outcomes:

-   -   1. No cycle (the last transaction Tj does not exist in the         wait-for table).     -   2. There is a cycle but Ti is not a part of it (the last         transaction Tj has been traversed before, but Ti !=Tj).     -   3. There is a cycle involving Ti but Ti is not the youngest         transaction in the cycle (the last transaction Tj==Ti).     -   4. There is a cycle involving Ti and Ti is the youngest         transaction in the cycle (the last traversed transaction         Ti==Tj).         In an example, S continues to wait (for another time period P)         for cases 1-3 above. S aborts Ti for example 4 above.

Once a transaction Ti determines that it is the victim of a deadlock, the subject technology will returns a statement indicating a deadlock (e.g., StatementOutcome::DEADLOCK) to an execution node (or to the execution platform 110, or a client, or transaction manager 440) that attempts to finalize the current statement. The execution node will then be responsible for:

-   -   Abort the transaction. This is implemented by updating TST.Ti as         ABORTED so that all previously held locks of Ti are released.     -   Propagate the deadlock error, which may eventually be returned         to the user.

The subject technology may additionally include the cycle information in the error message to help the user eliminate the deadlock.

As mentioned above, the protocol described above (e.g., FIG. 8 ) may not be applicable to a scenario when a transaction executes multiple statements in parallel. To help illustrate this problem, assume that transaction T0 has two statements S1 and S2. In this example, S1 is currently waiting for transaction T,1 and S2 is currently waiting for transaction T2. Both transactions T1 and T2 are waiting for T1. When T1 is performing deadlock detection, T0.S2 could have already updated the wait-for information as T0→T2 and thus T1 will not abort itself in this instance. Similarly, when T2 is performing deadlock detection, T0.S1 could have already updated the wait-for information as T0→T1 and thus T2 will not abort itself in this instance. This example scenario is problematic because the deadlock may never be resolved.

In the above example, a reason why the protocol may not resolve the deadlock for parallel statements is that the invariant that a transaction only publishes its oldest conflicting transaction to the wait-for table may no longer hold because multiple statements of a transaction can modify the wait-for table concurrently. In order to address this problem where transactions can execute in parallel and extend the protocol to support such parallel transactions, in some embodiments, the deadlock detection algorithm can be extended so that a statement of a transaction Ti will only publish Ti→Tj into the wait-for table if:

-   -   1. Ti is currently not waiting for any conflicting transaction         in the wait-for table, or     -   2. There exists Ti→Tk in the wait-for table and Tj is older than         Tk.         Moreover, after performing deadlock detection, a statement will         only remove the wait-for information from the wait-for table if         this information is published by this statement.

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram illustrating operations of a database system in performing a method, in accordance with some embodiments of the present disclosure. The method 900 may be embodied in computer-readable instructions for execution by one or more hardware components (e.g., one or more processors) such that the operations of the method 900 may be performed by components of network-based database system 102, such as components of the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110. Accordingly, the method 900 is described below, by way of example with reference thereto. However, it shall be appreciated that the method 900 may be deployed on various other hardware configurations and is not intended to be limited to deployment within the network-based database system 102.

In the example of FIG. 9 , a particular execution node (e.g., execution node 302-1), utilizing in part deadlock handling logic 480, performs the following operations. It is appreciated, however, that other components of the subject system can perform the following operations in some embodiments.

At operation 902, the execution node 302-1 performs a locking operation on a first set of keys by a first statement of a first transaction.

At operation 904, the execution node 302-1 determines that a conflict occurred between the first statement and a second transaction.

At operation 906, the execution node 302-1 determines that the second transaction has yet to complete after a predetermined period of time.

At operation 908, the execution node 302-1 performs a deadlock detection process, the performing including the following operations. At operation 910, the execution node 302-1 stores a key and value in a table indicating the first transaction and the second transaction. At operation 912, the execution node 302-1 detects, based at least in part on a graph traversal of the table starting from the first transaction, a cycle between the first transaction and the second transaction. At operation 914, the execution node 302-1 determines that the first transaction is the youngest transaction in the detected cycle.

In some embodiments, performing the deadlock detection process can include the following operations. The execution node 302-1 determines that no cycle is indicated in the table, or determines that a particular cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not associated with the particular cycle, or determines that a second cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not the youngest transaction in the second cycle. Further, execution node 302-1 stores a key value pair in the table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, the key indicates the first transaction and the value indicates the second transaction. In an example, the value further includes a statement number and a restart count.

In some embodiments, performing the deadlock detection process can include the following operations when transactions are executing in parallel in the subject system.

The execution node 302-1 determines that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction, the conflicting transaction comprising a particular transaction that has requested a lock on the first set of keys prior to the first transaction performing the locking operation. For example, determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction is based at least in part on not locating information in the table indicating a key value pair, the key value pair including a key corresponding to the first transaction and a value corresponding to the conflicting transaction.

Moreover, execution node 302-1 determines, in a graph representation of the table, that an edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction, the edge corresponding to a key value pair in the table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, the key indicating the first transaction and the value indicating the second transaction.

The execution node 302-1, in response to determining that the first transaction is not waiting for the conflicting transaction, or determining that the edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction: execution node 302-1 stores, in the table, a particular key value pair corresponding to the first transaction and the conflicting transaction, the particular key value pair indicating an edge between the first transaction and the conflicting transaction in the graph representation of the table.

Further, execution node 302-1 determines that the conflicting transaction has completed executing; and removes the particular key value pair from the table.

At operation 916, the execution node 302-1 ceases execution of the first transaction in response to the first transaction being the youngest transaction in the detected cycle.

FIG. 10 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of a machine 1000 in the form of a computer system within which a set of instructions may be executed for causing the machine 1000 to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, according to an example embodiment. Specifically, FIG. 10 shows a diagrammatic representation of the machine 1000 in the example form of a computer system, within which instructions 1016 (e.g., software, a program, an application, an applet, an app, or other executable code) for causing the machine 1000 to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein may be executed. For example, the instructions 1016 may cause the machine 1000 to execute any one or more operations of method 500, method 600, method 700, method 800, and method 900. As another example, the instructions 1016 may cause the machine 1000 to implement portions of the data flows illustrated in at least FIG. 4 . In this way, the instructions 1016 transform a general, non-programmed machine into a particular machine 1000 (e.g., the compute service manager 108 or a node in the execution platform 110) that is specially configured to carry out any one of the described and illustrated functions in the manner described herein.

In alternative embodiments, the machine 1000 operates as a standalone device or may be coupled (e.g., networked) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the machine 1000 may operate in the capacity of a server machine or a client machine in a server-client network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment. The machine 1000 may comprise, but not be limited to, a server computer, a client computer, a personal computer (PC), a tablet computer, a laptop computer, a netbook, a smart phone, a mobile device, a network router, a network switch, a network bridge, or any machine capable of executing the instructions 1016, sequentially or otherwise, that specify actions to be taken by the machine 1000. Further, while only a single machine 1000 is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include a collection of machines 1000 that individually or jointly execute the instructions 1016 to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.

The machine 1000 includes processors 1010, memory 1030, and input/output (I/O) components 1050 configured to communicate with each other such as via a bus 1002. In an example embodiment, the processors 1010 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a reduced instruction set computing (RISC) processor, a complex instruction set computing (CISC) processor, a graphics processing unit (GPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a radio-frequency integrated circuit (RFIC), another processor, or any suitable combination thereof) may include, for example, a processor 1012 and a processor 1014 that may execute the instructions 1016. The term “processor” is intended to include multi-core processors 1010 that may comprise two or more independent processors (sometimes referred to as “cores”) that may execute instructions 1016 contemporaneously. Although FIG. 10 shows multiple processors 1010, the machine 1000 may include a single processor with a single core, a single processor with multiple cores (e.g., a multi-core processor), multiple processors with a single core, multiple processors with multiple cores, or any combination thereof.

The memory 1030 may include a main memory 1032, a static memory 1034, and a storage unit 1036, all accessible to the processors 1010 such as via the bus 1002. The main memory 1032, the static memory 1034, and the storage unit 1036 store the instructions 1016 embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. The instructions 1016 may also reside, completely or partially, within the main memory 1032, within the static memory 1034, within machine storage medium 1038 of the storage unit 1036, within at least one of the processors 1010 (e.g., within the processor's cache memory), or any suitable combination thereof, during execution thereof by the machine 1000.

The I/O components 1050 include components to receive input, provide output, produce output, transmit information, exchange information, capture measurements, and so on. The specific I/O components 1050 that are included in a particular machine 1000 will depend on the type of machine. For example, portable machines such as mobile phones will likely include a touch input device or other such input mechanisms, while a headless server machine will likely not include such a touch input device. It will be appreciated that the I/O components 1050 may include many other components that are not shown in FIG. 10 . The I/O components 1050 are grouped according to functionality merely for simplifying the following discussion and the grouping is in no way limiting. In various example embodiments, the I/O components 1050 may include output components 1052 and input components 1054. The output components 1052 may include visual components (e.g., a display such as a plasma display panel (PDP), a light emitting diode (LED) display, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a projector, or a cathode ray tube (CRT)), acoustic components (e.g., speakers), other signal generators, and so forth. The input components 1054 may include alphanumeric input components (e.g., a keyboard, a touch screen configured to receive alphanumeric input, a photo-optical keyboard, or other alphanumeric input components), point-based input components (e.g., a mouse, a touchpad, a trackball, a joystick, a motion sensor, or another pointing instrument), tactile input components (e.g., a physical button, a touch screen that provides location and/or force of touches or touch gestures, or other tactile input components), audio input components (e.g., a microphone), and the like.

Communication may be implemented using a wide variety of technologies. The I/O components 1050 may include communication components 1064 operable to couple the machine 1000 to a network 1080 or devices 1070 via a coupling 1082 and a coupling 1072, respectively. For example, the communication components 1064 may include a network interface component or another suitable device to interface with the network 1080. In further examples, the communication components 1064 may include wired communication components, wireless communication components, cellular communication components, and other communication components to provide communication via other modalities. The devices 1070 may be another machine or any of a wide variety of peripheral devices (e.g., a peripheral device coupled via a universal serial bus (USB)). For example, as noted above, the machine 1000 may correspond to any one of the compute service manager 108 or the execution platform 110, and the devices 1070 may include the client device 114 or any other computing device described herein as being in communication with the network-based database system 102 or the cloud storage platform 104.

Executable Instructions and Machine Storage Medium

The various memories (e.g., 1030, 1032, 1034, and/or memory of the processor(s) 1010 and/or the storage unit 1036) may store one or more sets of instructions 1016 and data structures (e.g., software) embodying or utilized by any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein. These instructions 1016, when executed by the processor(s) 1010, cause various operations to implement the disclosed embodiments.

As used herein, the terms “machine-storage medium,” “device-storage medium,” and “computer-storage medium” mean the same thing and may be used interchangeably in this disclosure. The terms refer to a single or multiple non-transitory storage devices and/or non-transitory media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store executable instructions and/or data. The terms shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to, solid-state memories, and optical and magnetic media, including memory internal or external to processors. Specific examples of machine-storage media, computer-storage media, and/or device-storage media include non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The terms “machine-storage media,” “computer-storage media,” and “device-storage media” specifically exclude carrier waves, modulated data signals, and other such media, at least some of which are covered under the term “signal medium” discussed below.

Transmission Medium

In various example embodiments, one or more portions of the network 1080 may be an ad hoc network, an intranet, an extranet, a virtual private network (VPN), a local-area network (LAN), a wireless LAN (WLAN), a wide-area network (WAN), a wireless WAN (WWAN), a metropolitan-area network (MAN), the Internet, a portion of the Internet, a portion of the public switched telephone network (PSTN), a plain old telephone service (POTS) network, a cellular telephone network, a wireless network, a Wi-Fi® network, another type of network, or a combination of two or more such networks. For example, the network 1080 or a portion of the network 1080 may include a wireless or cellular network, and the coupling 1082 may be a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) connection, a Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) connection, or another type of cellular or wireless coupling. In this example, the coupling 1082 may implement any of a variety of types of data transfer technology, such as Single Carrier Radio Transmission Technology (1×RTT), Evolution-Data Optimized (EVDO) technology, General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) technology, Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) technology, third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) including 3G, fourth generation wireless (4G) networks, Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), High-Speed Packet Access (HSPA), Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), Long Term Evolution (LTE) standard, others defined by various standard-setting organizations, other long-range protocols, or other data transfer technology.

The instructions 1016 may be transmitted or received over the network 1080 using a transmission medium via a network interface device (e.g., a network interface component included in the communication components 1064) and utilizing any one of a number of well-known transfer protocols (e.g., hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP)). Similarly, the instructions 1016 may be transmitted or received using a transmission medium via the coupling 1072 (e.g., a peer-to-peer coupling) to the devices 1070. The terms “transmission medium” and “signal medium” mean the same thing and may be used interchangeably in this disclosure. The terms “transmission medium” and “signal medium” shall be taken to include any intangible medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying the instructions 1016 for execution by the machine 1000, and include digital or analog communications signals or other intangible media to facilitate communication of such software. Hence, the terms “transmission medium” and “signal medium” shall be taken to include any form of modulated data signal, carrier wave, and so forth. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.

Computer-Readable Medium

The terms “machine-readable medium,” “computer-readable medium,” and “device-readable medium” mean the same thing and may be used interchangeably in this disclosure. The terms are defined to include both machine-storage media and transmission media. Thus, the terms include both storage devices/media and carrier waves/modulated data signals.

The various operations of example methods described herein may be performed, at least partially, by one or more processors that are temporarily configured (e.g., by software) or permanently configured to perform the relevant operations. Similarly, the methods described herein may be at least partially processor-implemented. For example, at least some of the operations of the method 500 may be performed by one or more processors. The performance of certain of the operations may be distributed among the one or more processors, not only residing within a single machine, but also deployed across a number of machines. In some example embodiments, the processor or processors may be located in a single location (e.g., within a home environment, an office environment, or a server farm), while in other embodiments the processors may be distributed across a number of locations.

CONCLUSION

Although the embodiments of the present disclosure have been described with reference to specific example embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader scope of the inventive subject matter. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. The accompanying drawings that form a part hereof show, by way of illustration, and not of limitation, specific embodiments in which the subject matter may be practiced. The embodiments illustrated are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the teachings disclosed herein. Other embodiments may be used and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. This Detailed Description, therefore, is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of various embodiments is defined only by the appended claims, along with the full range of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.

Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent, to those of skill in the art, upon reviewing the above description.

In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended; that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim is still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A system comprising: at least one hardware processor; and a memory storing instructions that cause the at least one hardware processor to perform operations comprising: executing, using an execution node provided by an execution platform, a first transaction and a second transaction on a database system; determining, using the execution node provided by the execution platform, that a conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction; performing, using the execution node, a deadlock detection process, the performing comprising: storing, using the execution node, a key value pair in a table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, wherein the key indicates the first transaction and the value indicates the second transaction, and wherein the value includes a statement number; detecting, using the execution node, based at least in part on a graph traversal of a table starting from the first transaction, a cycle between the first transaction and the second transaction; determining, using the execution node, that the first transaction is a youngest transaction in the detected cycle; and ceasing, using the execution node, execution of the first transaction in response to the first transaction being the youngest transaction in the detected cycle.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the operations further comprise: performing a locking operation on a first set of keys by a first statement of a first transaction; and determining that the second transaction has yet to complete after a predetermined period of time prior to determining that the conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction.
 3. The system of claim 2, wherein the first transaction and the second transaction are executing in parallel and performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction, the conflicting transaction comprising a particular transaction that has requested a lock on the first set of keys prior to the first transaction performing the locking operation.
 4. The system of claim 3, wherein determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction is based at least in part on not locating information in the table indicating a key value pair, the key value pair including a key corresponding to the first transaction and a value corresponding to the conflicting transaction.
 5. The system of claim 3, wherein the operations further comprise: determining, in a graph representation of the table, that an edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction, the edge corresponding to a key value pair in the table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, the key indicating the first transaction and the value indicating the second transaction.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining that the first transaction is not waiting for the conflicting transaction, or determining that the edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction: storing, in the table, a particular key value pair corresponding to the first transaction and the conflicting transaction, the particular key value pair indicating an edge between the first transaction and the conflicting transaction in the graph representation of the table.
 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the operations further comprising: determining that the conflicting transaction has completed executing; and removing the particular key value pair from the table.
 8. The system of claim 1, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that no cycle is indicated in the table.
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that a particular cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not associated with the particular cycle, or determining that a second cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not the youngest transaction in the second cycle.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the value further includes a restart count.
 11. A method comprising: executing, using an execution node provided by an execution platform, a first transaction and a second transaction on a database system; determining, using the execution node provided by the execution platform, that a conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction; performing, using the execution node, a deadlock detection process, the performing comprising: storing, using the execution node, a key value pair in a table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, wherein the key indicates the first transaction and the value indicates the second transaction, and wherein the value includes a statement number; detecting, using the execution node, based at least in part on a graph traversal of a table starting from the first transaction, a cycle between the first transaction and the second transaction; determining, using the execution node, that the first transaction is a youngest transaction in the detected cycle; and ceasing, using the execution node, execution of the first transaction in response to the first transaction being the youngest transaction in the detected cycle.
 12. The method of claim 11, further comprising: performing a locking operation on a first set of keys by a first statement of a first transaction; and determining that the second transaction has yet to complete after a predetermined period of time prior to determining that the conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the first transaction and the second transaction are executing in parallel and performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction, the conflicting transaction comprising a particular transaction that has requested a lock on the first set of keys prior to the first transaction performing the locking operation.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction is based at least in part on not locating information in the table indicating a key value pair, the key value pair including a key corresponding to the first transaction and a value corresponding to the conflicting transaction.
 15. The method of claim 13, further comprising: determining, in a graph representation of the table, that an edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction, the edge corresponding to a key value pair in the table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, the key indicating the first transaction and the value indicating the second transaction.
 16. The method of claim 15, further comprising: in response to determining that the first transaction is not waiting for the conflicting transaction, or determining that the edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction: storing, in the table, a particular key value pair corresponding to the first transaction and the conflicting transaction, the particular key value pair indicating an edge between the first transaction and the conflicting transaction in the graph representation of the table.
 17. The method of claim 16, further comprising: determining that the conflicting transaction has completed executing; and removing the particular key value pair from the table.
 18. The method of claim 11, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that no cycle is indicated in the table.
 19. The method of claim 11, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that a particular cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not associated with the particular cycle, or determining that a second cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not the youngest transaction in the second cycle.
 20. The method of claim 11, wherein the value further includes a restart count.
 21. A non-transitory computer-storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors of a machine, configure the machine to perform operations comprising: executing, using an execution node provided by an execution platform, a first transaction and a second transaction on a database system; determining, using the execution node provided by the execution platform, that a conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction; performing, using the execution node, a deadlock detection process, the performing comprising: storing, using the execution node, a key value pair in a table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, wherein the key indicates the first transaction and the value indicates the second transaction, and wherein the value includes a statement number; detecting, using the execution node, based at least in part on a graph traversal of a table starting from the first transaction, a cycle between the first transaction and the second transaction; determining, using the execution node, that the first transaction is a youngest transaction in the detected cycle; and ceasing, using the execution node, execution of the first transaction in response to the first transaction being the youngest transaction in the detected cycle.
 22. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 21, wherein the operations further comprise: performing a locking operation on a first set of keys by a first statement of a first transaction; and determining that the second transaction has yet to complete after a predetermined period of time prior to determining that the conflict occurred between the first transaction and the second transaction.
 23. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 22, wherein the first transaction and the second transaction are executing in parallel and performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction, the conflicting transaction comprising a particular transaction that has requested a lock on the first set of keys prior to the first transaction performing the locking operation.
 24. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 23, wherein determining that the first transaction is not waiting for a conflicting transaction is based at least in part on not locating information in the table indicating a key value pair, the key value pair including a key corresponding to the first transaction and a value corresponding to the conflicting transaction.
 25. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 23, wherein the operations further comprise: determining, in a graph representation of the table, that an edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction, the edge corresponding to a key value pair in the table, the key value pair comprising a key and a value, the key indicating the first transaction and the value indicating the second transaction.
 26. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 25, wherein the operations further comprise: in response to determining that the first transaction is not waiting for the conflicting transaction, or determining that the edge between the first transaction and the particular transaction is indicated in the table and that the conflicting transaction is older than the particular transaction: storing, in the table, a particular key value pair corresponding to the first transaction and the conflicting transaction, the particular key value pair indicating an edge between the first transaction and the conflicting transaction in the graph representation of the table.
 27. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 26, wherein the operations further comprising: determining that the conflicting transaction has completed executing; and removing the particular key value pair from the table.
 28. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 21, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that no cycle is indicated in the table.
 29. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 21, wherein performing the deadlock detection process further comprises: determining that a particular cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not associated with the particular cycle, or determining that a second cycle is indicated in the table and the first transaction is not the youngest transaction in the second cycle.
 30. The non-transitory computer-storage medium of claim 21, wherein the value further includes a restart count. 